Legislator Case Law & Legislation
XVII AmC 6386/12 AI generated

Consumer court dismisses plaintiff's claim to declare a standard contract clause prohibited due to lack of evidence.

Case Number XVII AmC 6386/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The consumer court dismissed the plaintiff's action seeking a declaration that a specific standard contract clause was prohibited. The plaintiff alleged the clause created a significant imbalance in rights, while the defendant argued the clause was transparent and fair. The court rejected the claim because the plaintiff failed to provide sufficient evidence proving the clause violated the law.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; Ustawa o warunkach zawarcia i treści umów konsumenckich: A standard contract clause is deemed prohibited only if the plaintiff provides concrete evidence of a significant imbalance in rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer.

Keywords

AI generated
consumer protection law standard contract clause prohibited clause significant imbalance burden of proof consumer court jurisdiction unfair terms

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów
Ustawa o warunkach zawarcia i treści umów konsumenckich

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt XVII AmC 6386/12 WYROK ZAOCZNY W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 21 marca 2014 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie - Sąd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w składzie: Przewodniczący: SSR del. Adam Malinowski Protokolant: starszy sekretarz sądowy Marika Józefczyk po rozpoznaniu na rozprawie w dniu 21 marca 2014 r. w Warszawie sprawy z powództwa (...) w P. przeciwko (...) Sp. z o.o. w K. o uznanie postanowienia wzorca umowy za niedozwolone powództwo oddala. SSR del. Adam Malinowski