Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II C 902/20 AI generated

Civil court dismisses plaintiff's claim for payment against a bank due to lack of evidence.

Case Number II C 902/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The civil court dismissed the plaintiffs' claim for payment against the bank, ruling that the plaintiff failed to meet their burden of proof. The plaintiffs argued they were owed funds based on a specific transaction, but the bank contested the validity of the claim. Consequently, the court determined that without sufficient documentary evidence, the plaintiff's request for payment could not be supported.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 315 § 1 k.c.; Art. 315 § 2 k.c.: The plaintiff bears the burden of proving the existence of the claimed debt; failure to provide sufficient evidence results in the dismissal of the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
burden of proof civil claim bank liability lack of evidence dismissal of suit plaintiff obligation payment dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 315 § 1 k.c.
Art. 315 § 2 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygnatura akt II C 902/20 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ (...), dnia 22 marca 2022 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi II Wydział Cywilny w następującym składzie: Przewodniczący: SSO Paweł Filipiak Protokolant: Małgorzata Grzęda po rozpoznaniu w dniu 1 marca 2022 r. w Łodzi na rozprawie sprawy z powództwa A. D. i M. D. przeciwko (...) Bank (...) Spółce Akcyjnej w W. o zapłatę 1. oddala powództwo; 2. nie obciąża A. D. i M. D. obowiązkiem zwrotu kosztów procesu.