Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's procedural error regarding defense costs does not justify overturning the first-instance sentence.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal against the first-instance criminal judgment. The defense argued that the lower court erred in awarding costs for the defense lawyer's failure to appear at two court sessions. The court upheld the original sentence but ordered the state to pay the defense lawyer the awarded costs, while exempting the defendant from paying court fees due to his prison status.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 ust. 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy Prawo o Adwokaturze; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 634 k.p.k.: A procedural error by the defense counsel does not constitute grounds for overturning a criminal verdict if the court separately awards the counsel's costs and exempts the defendant from court fees based on material circumstances.