Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Ka 20/22 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; defense lawyer's procedural error regarding defense costs does not justify overturning the first-instance sentence.

Case Number VI Ka 20/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defense lawyer's appeal against the first-instance criminal judgment. The defense argued that the lower court erred in awarding costs for the defense lawyer's failure to appear at two court sessions. The court upheld the original sentence but ordered the state to pay the defense lawyer the awarded costs, while exempting the defendant from paying court fees due to his prison status.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 ust. 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.; Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy Prawo o Adwokaturze; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 634 k.p.k.: A procedural error by the defense counsel does not constitute grounds for overturning a criminal verdict if the court separately awards the counsel's costs and exempts the defendant from court fees based on material circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
criminal appeal defense costs procedural error court fees exemption lawyer's absence material circumstances state payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 ust. 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.
Art. 29 ust. 1 ustawy Prawo o Adwokaturze
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 280 § 2 k.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text