Court imposes combined sentence for multiple thefts and grants suspended sentence execution due to close temporal link.

The court found the defendant guilty of multiple thefts and imposed a combined sentence of five years imprisonment. The prosecution argued for cumulative punishment, while the defense sought leniency based on the defendant's lack of assets and the close temporal proximity of the crimes. The court ruled that the short time interval between offenses indicated a single criminal intent, justifying a combined sentence at the lower limit of the statutory range and allowing for a suspended execution.