III K 124/19
AI generated
Court sentenced defendants to prison and ordered them to pay half court costs and fines.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted two defendants of fraud and forgery, sentencing them to imprisonment and ordering them to pay court costs. While the defendant J.H. was exempted from costs due to lack of assets, the other two defendants were found to have the financial means to pay. Consequently, the court ordered the defendants to bear half of the court expenses and imposed specific fines on each.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 44§2 k.k.; Art. 63§1 k.k.; Art. 624§1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt. 6, 5 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych: The court must confiscate evidence used in the crime, order the execution of the sentence, and assign court costs to defendants who possess the financial means to pay them.
Keywords
AI generated
fraudulent land sale
forged identity documents
court costs allocation
exemption from costs
financial means assessment
confiscation of evidence
joint criminal liability
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 44§2 k.k.
Art. 63§1 k.k.
Art. 624§1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt. 6 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Art. 2 ust. 1 pkt. 5 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 18§1 k.k
art. 286§1 k.k
art. 294§1 k.k
art. 270§1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedIII KO 78/22
Supreme Court dismisses retrial request regarding civil compensation obligation in criminal sentencing.
II AKa 144/18
Appeal court partially allowed cassation appeal, modifying combined sentences and probation terms for fraud defendants.
II K 1488/18
Court sentenced defendant to 10 months imprisonment suspended for 3 years for fraud causing property loss.
IX Ka 194/14
Appeal court reduced court fees due to sentencing error but dismissed appeal on fraud charges.