Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XVII AmC 6555/12 AI generated

Consumer court dismissed plaintiff's claim to declare a standard contract clause prohibited due to lack of specific evidence.

Case Number XVII AmC 6555/12
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The consumer court dismissed the plaintiff's action seeking to declare a standard contract clause prohibited. The plaintiff alleged unfair terms, but the defendant provided no evidence of the clause's content or the specific circumstances of the contract formation. Consequently, the court ruled that the plaintiff failed to substantiate the necessary elements for a prohibition finding.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów; Ustawa o prawie konsumenta: Without concrete evidence of the specific contract clause and its application to the individual case, a court cannot declare a standard term prohibited.

Keywords

AI generated
consumer protection law standard contract terms prohibition of unfair clauses burden of proof consumer court jurisdiction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa o ochronie konsumentów
Ustawa o prawie konsumenta

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt XVII AmC 6555/12 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 18 lutego 2014 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie - Sąd Ochrony Konkurencji i Konsumentów w składzie: Przewodniczący: SSR del. Adam Malinowski Protokolant: starszy sekretarz sądowy Marika Józefczyk po rozpoznaniu na rozprawie w dniu 18 lutego 2014 r. w Warszawie sprawy z powództwa (...)w P. przeciwko H. P. o uznanie postanowienia wzorca umowy za niedozwolone powództwo oddala. SSR del. Adam Malinowski