Court dismissed burglary charge due to lack of intent to steal, finding only property damage occurred.

The court dismissed the prosecution's charges against the defendant for attempted burglary and theft. Although the defendant entered two apartments after breaking locks, the court found no evidence proving he intended to steal the contents at the moment of entry. The defendant's explanation that he sought his sister, supported by witness testimony and the fact that windows were open for eight hours, made the theft intent highly improbable. Consequently, the court determined the defendant only committed a minor property damage offense, which the victims did not pursue, leading to the dismissal of the criminal proceedings.