Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IX GC 3202/18 AI generated

Court dismisses claim for simultaneous demand of performance and set-off in one document.

Case Number IX GC 3202/18
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's request to simultaneously demand performance and set off a debt in a single document. The defendant argued that such a combined action was procedurally improper, while the plaintiff contended it was necessary for efficiency. The court ruled that the law does not permit these distinct legal actions to be executed concurrently within one procedural act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 481 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 ust. 1 k.p.c.: The court holds that a creditor cannot simultaneously demand performance and effect set-off in a single procedural document.

Keywords

AI generated
set-off demand for performance procedural document simultaneous action civil procedure creditor rights legal impossibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 481 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 ust. 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Pozwana nie byłą uprawniona równocześnie (w ramach jednego pisma)wezwać dłużnika do spełnienia świadczenia, czyli uczynić je wymagalnym, i w jednej chwili potrącić wymienioną wierzytelność z należności powoda.