I ACa 1183/21
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal against bank loan contract invalidity, ruling missing exchange rate clauses caused essential defect.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the invalidity of a mortgage loan contract due to abusive indexing clauses. The court found that removing these clauses left the contract lacking essential elements required by banking law, rendering it void under the Civil Code. Consequently, the lower court's decision declaring the contract invalid was upheld, and the appellant was ordered to pay the bank's appeal costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 58 § 1 k.c.; Art. 69 Prawa bankowego; Art. 409 k.c.: A contract lacking essential elements due to the removal of abusive clauses is void, and unjust enrichment does not apply if the benefit was consumed or lost.
Keywords
AI generated
invalid contract essential defect
abusive banking clauses
unjust enrichment consumption
mortgage loan contract
civil code section 58
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 58 § 1 k.c.
Art. 385 § 1 k.c.
Art. 409 k.c.
Art. 69 Prawa bankowego
Art. 385 k.p.c.
Art. 98 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.
art. 189 k.p.c
art. 358 § 2 k.c
art. 410 k.c
art. 405 k.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok SN z 4.4.2008 r., I PK 247/07
I CSK 556/18
Supreme Court dismisses request to declare bank contract clause invalid due to judge recusal. The judge was excluded from the case, and the request for invalidity was not examined.
III CZP 29/17
Civil Code requires unfair contract clause assessment at signing time, not based on later practice.
II CSK 19/18
Supreme Court quashes cassation appeal regarding foreign currency debt calculation in mortgage loan contract dispute.
I CK 297/05
Supreme Court vacated appeal ruling on unfair contract terms, requiring full reasoning for general clauses under Civil Code.
I CSK 125/15
Supreme Court invalidates unfair contract clause allowing seller to cancel car sales under vague circumstances.
I CSK 945/14
Supreme Court dismissed cassation appeal, upholding lower court's finding that unfair contract terms were prohibited.
Related Decisions
AI generatedV ACa 2610/23
Court dismisses consumer loan claims against bank, allowing partial appeal on expert fee calculation.
I ACa 133/22
Court dismissed bank's appeal and awarded plaintiffs half of their legal fees as separate costs.
I ACa 495/22
Court dismissed appeal against bank's claim, upholding invalidity of loan contract due to abusive valuation clauses.
I ACa 861/21
Court allows mortgage claim but suspends payment until consumer repays loan or secures debt.