II Ka 213/22
AI generated
Court quashes criminal sentence due to procedural error in sentencing calculation and remands for retrial.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court quashed the first-instance criminal judgment and remanded the case for a retrial. The prosecution appealed the sentence, arguing a procedural error regarding the calculation of the penalty amount. The court found that the lower court failed to properly account for specific financial data and prior records before imposing the punishment, violating procedural rules.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt. 4 k.p.k.: A criminal sentence is void if the court fails to properly evaluate relevant facts or imposes a penalty that is grossly disproportionate to the circumstances.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
procedural error
sentencing calculation
gross disproportionality
remand for retrial
criminal procedure code
penalty adjustment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt. 4 k.p.k.
Art. 2 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 387 § 2 k.p.k
art. 32 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 493/23
Criminal appeal dismissed due to lack of prosecutor's complaint under Polish Code of Criminal Procedure.
V Ka 334/23
Appeal dismissed; disproportionate ban upheld despite driver's livelihood and family needs.
II Ka 71/24
Appeal against conviction partially allowed; court upheld guilt but modified sentencing due to procedural errors.
VI Ka 165/24
Court partially allows appeal to combine sentences and lifetime driving ban from three prior judgments into one final ruling.
II Ka 145/20
Court corrects clerical error and increases sentence in criminal appeal case under Polish Criminal Procedure Code.