II W 576/21
AI generated
Court convicted defendant of speeding 34 km/h over limit in built-up area and sentenced to fine.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of speeding 34 km/h over the 50 km/h limit in a built-up area and sentenced him to a 500 zł fine. The defendant argued he only exceeded the limit by 10 km/h based on his phone's GPS history, but the court rejected this claim as unsupported by evidence. The court relied on the consistent testimony of the police officer who used a laser device and official calibration documents to confirm the speed violation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 92a kw; Art. 20 ust. 1 Prawo o ruchu drogowym: Violation of speed limits in built-up areas constitutes a criminal offense regardless of the specific margin of excess, and the court must evaluate witness testimony and technical evidence to determine guilt.
Keywords
AI generated
speeding offense
built-up area limit
laser speed measurement
GPS evidence admissibility
criminal fine penalty
police witness testimony
traffic safety regulation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 92a kw
art. 24§1 i 3 kw
art. 33§ 1 i 2 kw
art. 121§1 kpw
art. 624§1 kpk
art. 17 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym
art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym