Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II W 35/22 AI generated

Court convicts driver for speeding and driving under influence, rejecting defense's alcohol measurement argument.

Case Number II W 35/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of speeding and driving under the influence, imposing a fine and a six-month driving ban. The defense argued that the second breathalyzer reading was unreliable due to measurement uncertainty, but the court found the first reading definitive. Consequently, the court ruled that the evidence clearly established the defendant's guilt under the relevant traffic and alcohol laws.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 92a kw; Art. 87§1 kw; Art. 46 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy o wychowaniu w trzeźwości i przeciwdziałaniu alkoholizmowi: The court must evaluate all evidence, including measurement uncertainty, to determine if the statutory threshold for 'state after alcohol use' is met; a single reading exceeding the limit establishes guilt even if a subsequent reading falls within the error margin.

Keywords

AI generated
speeding offense driving under influence breathalyzer measurement measurement uncertainty traffic safety law alcohol limit threshold criminal conviction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 92a kw
Art. 87§1 kw
Art. 87§3 kw
Art. 46 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy o wychowaniu w trzeźwości i przeciwdziałaniu alkoholizmowi
Art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1997 r. Prawo o ruchu drogowym
Art. 33§ 1 i 2 kw
Art. 24§3 kw
Art. 119 §1 kpw

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text