II K 303/21 AI generated

Court orders defendant to pay 6,350 PLN civil damages for theft and fraud under Art. 46 § 1 k.k.

Case Number II K 303/21

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2021-06-25

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court ruled that the defendant must compensate the victim for 6,350 PLN in damages caused by theft and fraud. The prosecution argued for full restitution, while the defense likely contested the amount or liability. The court applied Article 46 § 1 of the Criminal Code to order full compensation as a compensatory measure for the victim's loss.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 44 § 2 k.k.; Art. 195 k.k.w.; Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.; The court's power to order full compensation for damages serves a compensatory function to facilitate the victim's civil claims, and evidence may be confiscated or returned based on procedural necessity.

Keywords

AI generated

criminal compensation theft with entry fraudulent misrepresentation confiscation of evidence court costs exemption civil liability property damage

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 46 § 1 k.k.

Art. 44 § 2 k.k.

Art. 195 k.k.w.

Art. 230 § 2 k.p.k.

Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.

Art. 17 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych

art. 279 § 1 k.k

art. 286 § 1 k.k

art. 91§1 k.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Supreme Court partially quashes sentence for theft with breaking and entering due to insufficient evidence on door security.

Supreme Court partially allowed prosecutor's appeal, overturning lower court's fraud charge due to inconsistent factual findings.

AI generated

Court reduces theft sentence and changes facts due to witness credibility issues regarding entry method.

Court acquits defendant of burglary charges due to reasonable suspicion of theft by former employee.

Supreme Court vacates probation suspension due to material law violation regarding combined sentence calculation under Art. 69 § 1 CC.

Court convicted accomplice of burglary and theft, imposing one year and two months imprisonment for recidivism.

Court reduced sentence for defendant due to violation of ne bis in idem principle regarding prior acquittal.

Full text