Court dismissed appeal against conviction for attempted rape, upholding original sentence and costs. The court rejected factual errors and legal qualification claims. The appeal was dismissed due to lack of sufficient grounds under criminal procedure law.

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted rape under Article 178a of the Criminal Code. The defense argued for a change in the legal qualification of the act and alleged factual errors regarding the defendant's health and family situation, while the prosecutor opposed the appeal. The court found no merit in these arguments, as the original judgment correctly applied the law and established facts without error, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and the award of court costs to the state.