Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I C 420/21 AI generated

Civil court rejects security fund extract as sole proof of debt assignment validity and amount.

Case Number I C 420/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The civil court dismissed the plaintiff's claim to use a security fund extract as the sole evidence for debt assignment. The plaintiff argued the document proved the transfer of the claim, while the defendant contended it lacked legal presumption of truth. The court ruled that private documents do not automatically establish the validity or exact amount of acquired claims without further corroboration.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 227 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 228 § 1 k.p.c.: A private document such as a security fund extract does not carry a legal presumption of truth regarding the existence, validity, or specific amount of a transferred claim and cannot serve as the sole proof of its effectiveness.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure evidence admissibility security fund extract debt assignment legal presumption of truth private document validity creditor's rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 227 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 228 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

W postepowaniu cywilnym skutecznym dowodem potwierdzającym zasadność i wysokość wysuniętego roszczenia nie może być wyciąg z ksiąg funduszu sekurytyzacyjnego. Z tym dokumentem prywatnym nie wiąże się domniemanie prawne, iż jego treść przedstawia rzeczywisty stan rzeczy. Dokument potwierdza więc cesję wierzytelności, jednakże nie stanowi dowodu na jej skuteczność oraz istnienia i wysokości nabytej wierzytelności.