II Ka 186/22
AI generated
Court dismissed appeal by private prosecutor's representative against criminal conviction for theft, upholding first-instance judgment.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the appeal filed by the private prosecutor's representative against the first-instance criminal conviction. The appellant argued procedural errors and factual mistakes under Article 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, but the appellate court found no grounds to overturn the original verdict. Consequently, the judgment was upheld in its entirety, and the costs of the second instance were assigned to the appellant.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 § 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.: An appeal by a private prosecutor's representative is dismissed if the appellate court finds no procedural errors or factual mistakes affecting the judgment, resulting in the upholding of the first-instance decision.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
private prosecutor representative
procedural error
factual mistake
upholding judgment
costs of proceedings
theft conviction
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 13 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
§ 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 18 czerwca 2003 r. w sprawie wysokości i sposobu obliczania wydatków Skarbu Państwa w postępowaniu karnym
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 7 k.p.k
art. 410 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 322/22
Court dismissed prosecutor's appeal against acquittal, ruling procedural error did not affect the verdict's outcome.
VII Ka 188/24
Appeal court reduced drug offense penalty to lesser weight and credited prior detention to fine.
II Ka 184/22
Court modifies drunk driving sentence to suspended probation with vehicle ban and fine.
IX Ka 139/24
Court allows appeal against first-instance conviction, overturning verdict due to procedural errors and factual mistakes.
II AKa 68/24
Appeal against excessive sentence dismissed; court upheld first instance ruling on penalty and probation measures.