Military pensioner entitled to only one benefit; dual pension claims dismissed as incompatible with statutory scheme.

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for a second pension benefit, ruling that a military pensioner is legally restricted to a single type of pension. The plaintiff argued for an additional allowance, but the court found this violated the principle of exclusive entitlement under the relevant social security regulations. Consequently, the court held that granting a second benefit would contravene the statutory framework designed to prevent duplicate payments.