Formal employment contract without actual work duties does not trigger mandatory employee insurance coverage.

The court dismissed the employer's request to terminate the employee's insurance coverage, ruling that the formal employment contract remained valid despite the lack of actual work performance. The employer argued that since the employee was not performing duties, the statutory insurance obligation ceased, but the court found no evidence of a genuine termination of the labor relationship. Consequently, the court held that the existence of the contract alone mandates insurance coverage regardless of whether work was actually performed.