II Ka 635/21 AI generated

Court dismissed appeal against animal cruelty conviction, upholding first instance judgment on facts and law.

Case Number II Ka 635/21

Court / Authority Sąd powszechny

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2021-11-15

Outcome Dismissed

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance conviction for animal cruelty under Article 35 of the Animal Protection Act. The defendant argued procedural errors and factual inaccuracies regarding veterinary care, but the court found no impact on the verdict. Consequently, the original judgment was upheld, and the defendant was ordered to pay court costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 35 ust. 1a Ustawy o ochronie zwierząt; Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.: The court rejected appeals based on alleged procedural errors or factual mistakes that did not influence the final judgment, thereby upholding the conviction for animal cruelty.

Keywords

AI generated

animal protection law cruelty conviction appeal dismissal procedural error factual findings court costs second instance

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 35 ust. 1a Ustawy z dnia 21 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie zwierząt

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.

art. 636 § 1 kpk

art. 8 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych z dnia 23 czerwca 1973r.

art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k

art. 439 k.p.k

AI generated

Court partially allowed appeal regarding animal abandonment, ruling confiscation of one dog valid but others must be confiscated too.

Court suspended animal cruelty sentence with probation, fined defendant, and banned dog ownership.

W dniu 17 maja 2012 r. w Schronisku dla bezdomnych zwierząt w R. B. M. zakupił psa – sukę rasy mieszanej w typie L.. Pies stanowił jego wyłączną własność. Zajmował się nim osobiście. Pozostali członkowie rodziny nie opiekowali się psem, nie karmili go, nie wyprowadzali go na spacery. Pies nie był szczepiony. Pies nie był leczony i nie pozostawał pod opieką weterynarza

Supreme Court dismisses criminal appeal as obviously groundless for failing to prove procedural errors.

Court conditionally dismisses animal cruelty charge due to minor social harm and defendant's corrective actions.

Full text