VI Ka 621/21
AI generated
Appeal upheld in part; court vacates driving ban merger due to distinct scope requirements under Art. 90 § 2 KK.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court vacated the first-instance judgment regarding the merger of two driving bans while upholding the rest of the sentence. The defendant argued for a combined penalty, but the court found that the bans differed in scope and thus could not be legally merged under Article 90 § 2 of the Criminal Code. Consequently, the case was remanded for the lower court to issue separate orders for each distinct ban.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 90 § 2 k.k.; Art. 39 pkt 3 k.k.: Penalties differing in scope or subject matter, even if of the same type, do not subject to merger under Art. 90 § 2 of the Criminal Code.
Keywords
AI generated
merger of penalties
driving ban scope
Criminal Code Art 90
distinct subject matter
appellate review
remand for retrial
proportionality of sentence
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 90 § 2 k.k.
Art. 39 pkt 3 k.k.
Art. 577 k.p.k.
Art. 29 ust. 1 Prawo o Adwokaturze
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedSA w Szczecinie z dnia 12.05.2016 r. II AKa 58/16
SN z dnia 26.05.2020 r. I KZP 13/19
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Ka 236/22
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for theft and rejected defense's factual error claim.
VII Ka 362/21
Appeal against acquittal dismissed; prosecutor's factual error claim rejected by appellate court.
IV Ka 765/21
Appeal against criminal judgment upheld; defendant's financial hardship exempts him from court costs.
II Ka 496/25
Court dismissed defense appeal claiming legal error and factual mistakes regarding the defendant's conviction.
II AKa 29/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld murder conviction due to drunkenness aggravating domestic violence against mother.