Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI Ka 212/21 AI generated

Court partially allowed appeal by changing prison sentence to fine and reducing fines for defendant.

Case Number VI Ka 212/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court partially upheld the first-instance judgment by modifying the defendant's sentence and costs. The defendant appealed the conviction for theft and the imposed penalty, arguing procedural errors and excessive fines. The court found the original prison term inappropriate and substituted it with a daily fine, while also reducing the outstanding fines and shifting the burden of defense costs to the state.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 226 § 1 kk; Art. 57a § 1 kk; Art. 91 § 1 kk; Art. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k.; The court may substitute a prison sentence with a fine if the original term is deemed excessive, and it may reduce fines and shift state defense costs when the defendant is acquitted or the penalty is significantly mitigated.

Keywords

AI generated
substitution of penalty daily fine calculation reduction of fines state defense costs procedural error appeal theft conviction costs allocation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 226 § 1 kk
Art. 57a § 1 kk
Art. 91 § 1 kk
Art. 438 k.p.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 634 k.p.k.
Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r. w sprawie ponoszenia przez Skarb Państwa kosztów nieopłaconej pomocy prawnej udzielonej przez adwokata z urzędu
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text