II K 6/22
AI generated
Court combines sentences for multiple crimes using mixed absorption and cumulation principles.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court issued a joint verdict combining two separate prison sentences into a total term of ten months. The defendant was previously convicted of intentional offenses involving bodily harm and other crimes, with prior judgments already in force. The court applied a mixed approach, partially absorbing one sentence while cumulatively adding another, citing the defendant's high recidivism and the severity of the crimes against personal rights.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 569 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 88 k.k.: When combining sentences for concurrent crimes, the court may apply mixed absorption and cumulation principles if the severest penalty does not warrant life imprisonment and special circumstances do not justify full absorption.
Keywords
AI generated
concurrent crimes
joint verdict
absorption of sentences
cumulation of penalties
recidivism
prison term calculation
mixed sentencing
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 569 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 88 k.k.
Art. 577 k.p.k.
Art. 576 § 1 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 23.06.1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedSA w Lublinie z dnia 16.03.2010r., II AKa 57/10
SA w Lublinie z dnia 25.03.2010r., II AKa 59/10
SA w Katowicach z dnia 20.05.2008r., II AKa 129/08
SN z dnia 19.03.2008 r., IV KK 45/08
SA w Łodzi z dnia 27.11.2008r., II AKa 198/08
SA w Łodzi z dnia 18.11.2008r., II AKa 178/08
IV KK 45/08
Related Decisions
AI generatedVII K 99/14
Court combines prison sentences using asperation principle to avoid excessive total punishment for multiple crimes.
II AKa 162/19
Appeal court upheld original sentence rejecting defense's request for combined punishment due to insufficient crime linkage.
IV KK 1/26
Supreme Court dismisses cassation as obviously unfounded regarding expert opinion admissibility under Art. 201 k.p.k.
XI Ka 563/14
Appeal allowed; lower court failed to combine suspended and non-suspended sentences due to temporal rule.
V Ka 524/13
Appeal dismissed; combined sentence upheld as not grossly disproportionate despite mixed absorption and cumulation principles.