Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II AKa 124/21 AI generated

Appeal court reduced sentence for theft and combined penalties due to procedural error and factual findings.

Case Number II AKa 124/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appeal court overturned the first-instance judgment's total sentence determination while upholding the conviction for theft. The defendant argued for leniency based on procedural errors and factual inaccuracies regarding the crime's duration and amount. The court found the original sentencing calculation flawed and corrected the total penalty by re-evaluating the specific theft period and combining the adjusted term with other convictions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 286 § 1 k.k.; Art. 91 § 2 k.k.; Art. 85 § 1 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.: When a lower court commits a procedural error or factual mistake affecting the calculation of a combined sentence, the appellate court must revoke the specific sentencing decision and re-impose the penalty based on corrected facts and statutory provisions.

Keywords

AI generated
theft conviction combined sentence procedural error factual findings appellate review penalty reduction criminal appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 91 § 2 k.k.
Art. 85 § 1 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
art. 286 § 1 k.k
art.91 § 2 k.k
art. 85 § 1 k.k
art.86 § 1 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text