Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
IX GC 3062/17 AI generated

Court rejects defense argument that denying facts is better than proving non-existence of facts.

Case Number IX GC 3062/17
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's procedural objection regarding the burden of proof. The defendant argued that simply denying the plaintiff's alleged circumstances was a valid defense strategy, rather than actively proving their non-existence. The court ruled that denying facts does not substitute for the legal requirement of demonstrating their absence or invalidity.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 201 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 202 § 1 k.p.c.: Denying alleged facts by the defendant does not replace the obligation to prove the non-existence of those facts.

Keywords

AI generated
burden of proof denial of facts procedural defense civil procedure evidence standard

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 201 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 202 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Jednym z możliwych sposobów obrony pozwanego w procesie stanowi zaprzeczenie podanym przez powoda okolicznościom, a nie podniesienie okoliczności ich niewykazania czy nieudowodnienia.