Legislator Case Law & Legislation
IX Ka 118/14 AI generated

Appeal partially allowed; court increased legal aid costs due to invoice discrepancy but rejected factual error claim.

Case Number IX Ka 118/14
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court partially upheld the appeal against a first-instance judgment regarding a minor traffic offense. The defendant was found guilty of endangering safety by driving carelessly, resulting in minor injuries to a pedestrian. The court rejected the claim of factual error regarding spinal fractures due to conflicting expert opinions but agreed that the first instance incorrectly calculated legal aid costs, increasing them from 442.80 to 1000 PLN based on submitted invoices.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 119 k.p.w. w zw. z art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 437 § 2 k.p.k.: An appeal based on alleged factual error is rejected when expert evidence contradicts the accused's claims, but an appeal based on procedural error regarding the calculation of legal aid costs is granted if the lower court failed to account for the actual documented expenses.

Keywords

AI generated
minor traffic offense legal aid costs procedural error factual error expert opinion legal aid attorney appellate review

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt. 2 i 3 k.p.k.
Art. 119 k.p.w. w zw. z art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 437 § 2 k.p.k.
Art. 437 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 109 § 1 k.p.w.
Art. 635 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 627 k.p.k.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text