Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ka 624/21 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld first-instance conviction for attempted theft and rejected defense's factual error claim.

Case Number II Ka 624/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for attempted theft, upholding the original judgment in its entirety. The defense argued that the court committed a factual error by accepting evidence that allegedly contradicted the defendant's testimony, but the appellate court found no such error in the record. Consequently, the court ruled that the lower court's findings were supported by the evidence and the conviction stands.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.; Art. 634 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 627 k.p.k.; Art. 8 w zw. z art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy o opłatach w sprawach karnych: An appeal based on alleged factual errors is rejected if the appellate court finds the lower court's findings were properly supported by the evidence presented.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted theft factual error appeal criminal appeal evidence evaluation court costs

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 634 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 636 § 1 k.p.k. w zw. z art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 8 w zw. z art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 437 § 2 k.p.k
art. 454 § 1 k.p.k
AI generated
VI Ka 111/21
Court partially quashes sentence for excessive penalty, remands for new trial on specific charges while upholding others.
IV Ka 731/24
Court partially allowed appeal by changing sentence to community service for two defendants based on procedural errors.
II AKa 144/22
Appeal against conviction for attempted murder and life imprisonment dismissed; facts and law upheld.
IX Ka 41/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld first instance conviction and penalty for driving under influence as legally correct.
II Ka 551/23
Court partially allowed appeal on sentencing, upholding conviction but reducing penalty due to excessive harshness.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text