II K 75/20
AI generated
Court applies older law on combined punishment to defendant charged with drug and ammunition possession.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of possessing controlled substances and ammunition, sentencing him to one year in prison. The defendant argued that the new law on combined punishment should apply, but the court rejected this claim. The court decided to apply the older law because it was more favorable to the defendant regarding the calculation of the total sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4 § 1 k.k.; Art. 63 § 1 k.k.: When a new law on combined punishment is in force at the time of judgment, the court must apply the older law if it is more favorable to the accused, considering all penal institutions such as probation limits and recidivism rules.
Keywords
AI generated
combined punishment
favorable law
retroactive application
drug possession
ammunition possession
penal institutions
in concreto assessment
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4 § 1 k.k.
Art. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała SN z dnia 12 marca 1996 r., I KZP 2/96
postanowienie SN z dnia 3 grudnia 2001 r., V KKN 67/01
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 316/21
Court convicts defendant for possessing large quantities of cannabis and psychotropic substances, sentencing him to six months imprisonment.
II K 542/21
Court convicts defendant of drug possession under Art. 62 NarkU and imposes a fine and restitution.
II K 1733/23
Court convicted defendant of minor drug possession and minor trafficking, sentencing to community service and daily fine.
II K 609/19
Jeżeli wniosek o uzasadnienie wyroku dotyczy tylko niektórych czynów lub niektórych oskarżonych, sąd może ograniczyć uzasadnienie do części wyroku objętych wnioskiem.
II K 217/20
Court sentenced minor for drug possession and firearm possession, rejecting probation due to high social harm.