Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II Ca 5/22 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court rejects request for court deposit due to lack of sufficient grounds for appeal.

Case Number II Ca 5/22
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal in Kielce dismissed the appellant's request for a court deposit following an appeal against a lower court's decision. The appellant, E. S., sought the deposit to cover potential costs, while the opposing party, the municipality, argued the appeal lacked merit. The court rejected the request because the appeal did not meet the statutory requirements for requiring a security deposit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 100 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 101 § 1 k.p.c.: An appeal against a decision on a claim for payment of money is not subject to a court deposit unless the appeal is clearly unfounded or the court deems it necessary to ensure the proper conduct of proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
court deposit requirement civil appeal procedure security for appeal costs of litigation appeal admissibility

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 100 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 101 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt II Ca 5/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 lutego 2022 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Kielcach II Wydział Cywilny Odwoławczy w składzie następującym: Przewodniczący: Sędzia SO Mariusz Broda po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym w dniu 4 lutego 2022 r. sprawy z wniosku E. S. z udziałem Gminy S. o wydanie depozytu sądowego na skutek apelacji wnioskodawcy E. S. od postanowienia Sądu Rejonowego w Staszowie z dnia 14 października 2021 r. sygn. akt I Ns 210/21 postanawia: oddalić apelację. (...) (...)