X P 885/13
AI generated
Court dismissed union activists' claim to reinstate employment due to employer liquidation, awarding costs instead.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the plaintiffs' lawsuit seeking reinstatement and severance pay after their employer was liquidated. The plaintiffs, who were union leaders, argued that the dismissal was pretextual and linked to their union activities, but the court found the liquidation a valid legal ground. Consequently, the court ruled that the dismissals were lawful and ordered the plaintiffs to bear the litigation costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 41 k.p.; Art. 36 k.p.; Art. 102 k.p.c.: Employer liquidation constitutes a valid ground for terminating employment contracts, precluding claims of pretextual dismissal or reinstatement, while the initiator of the action bears the procedural costs.
Keywords
AI generated
employer liquidation
dismissal pretext
union leader protection
reinstatement claim
litigation costs
labor law termination
valid cause dismissal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 41 k.p.
Art. 36 k.p.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
Art. 98 k.p.c.
§ 6 pt.4 w związku z 11 ust.1 pt.2 Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28.09.2002r.
art. 38 k.p
art. 30 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 274 § 1 k.s.h
art. 277 k.s.h
Art. 98 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedorz. SN z dn. 5.12.1967 r. III PRN 78/67 OSNC 1968/11/185
orz. Sądu Apelacyjnego we Wrocławiu III APz 135/92
postan. SN z dn. 27.04.1971 I Pz 17/71
wyrok SN z dn. 14.06.2005 r. V CK 719/04
II PK 147/2009
V CK 719/04
Supreme Court dismisses Social Insurance Fund's appeal against directors' exemption from liability for company debts.