X Ka 482/21
AI generated
Court corrects a clerical error in the description of traffic offenses by adding omitted speed and road sign details.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal corrected a clerical error in the lower court's judgment regarding the description of the defendant's traffic offenses. The defendant and prosecutor appealed, but the court focused solely on fixing the missing details about speed limits and road signs in the original text. The decision was made because the error was clearly typographical and did not affect the substantive legal qualification or the final penalty imposed.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 105 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 438 § 1 k.p.k.; Clerical errors in the description of criminal acts must be corrected if they are obvious and do not affect the substance of the judgment.
Keywords
AI generated
clerical error correction
traffic offense description
speed limit violation
road sign violation
criminal procedure law
judgment amendment
typographical mistake
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 105 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 438 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 174 § 1 k.k
art. 105 § 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
art. 173 § 1 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedVI Ka 707/25
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for fraud against elderly, rejecting defense's claim of procedural error.
II AKa 42/21
Appeal court upheld first-instance sentence and adjusted legal aid costs for co-defendants.
VI Ka 870/21
Appeal court quashes first-instance verdict due to denial of defense rights and remands for retrial.
II AKa 286/22
Appellate court dismissed defense appeals regarding factual errors and procedural violations in organized crime case.