Court upheld sentence but corrected legal citation error regarding conditional suspension of freedom deprivation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court rejected the prosecutor's appeal regarding excessive sentencing and the defense's appeal regarding the legality of the conditional suspension of freedom deprivation. While the court found the original sentence proportionate and the defendant's criminal record valid, it identified a clerical error where the wrong article of the Criminal Code was cited in the judgment. Consequently, the court upheld the entire verdict except for correcting the specific legal citation to the correct article.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 k.p.k.; Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k. in zw. z art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.; The court may uphold a verdict despite procedural errors if the substantive outcome remains legally sound, provided any clerical errors in statutory citations are corrected to ensure the judgment accurately reflects the applicable law.