III K 333/19
AI generated
Court combined multiple suspended sentences and fines into a single joint penalty for the defendant.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court combined several prior judgments against the defendant into a single joint penalty decision. The defendant had previously served time for various crimes, some with suspended sentences that were later executed. The court ruled that full absorption of these penalties was unjustified given the defendant's repeated negative behavior.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 85 § 1 k.k.; Art. 86 § 1 k.k.: The court may combine multiple penalties into a joint penalty, rejecting the principle of full absorption when it would unjustly reward repeated criminal conduct.
Keywords
AI generated
joint penalty
combined sentences
suspended sentence execution
full absorption principle
repeated offenses
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 85 § 1 k.k.
Art. 86 § 1 k.k.
Art. 572 k.p.k.
§ 14 ust. 5 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 288 § 1 k.k
art. 268 § 1 k.k
art. 286 § 1 k.k
art. 270 § 3 k.k
art. 18 § 2 k.k
art. 238 k.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII KK 63/06
Related Decisions
AI generatedII KK 366/24
Supreme Court dismisses cassation on procedural grounds, rejecting claims of judge selection flaws and apparent conflict of interest.
II AKa 295/23
Appeal court partially allowed appeal to add missing prior convictions and correct joint sentencing under Polish Criminal Code.
III KK 636/22
Supreme Court quashes joint sentence due to non-enforceability of one penalty under Art. 85 § 2 of Criminal Code.
III Kop 29/13
Court issues European Arrest Warrant for Polish citizen evading execution of 6-year prison sentence.
VI Ka 1113/21
Appeal against conditional dismissal dismissed; prior conviction bars alternative relief; case remanded for retrial.