II Kow 1085/21
AI generated
Court partially allowed appeal against prison food ration ban, replacing it with a warning for minor hygiene violations.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court partially overturned the prison director's decision to ban the prisoner from receiving food parcels for one month. While the court upheld the punishment for using vulgar language, it found the food ban excessive for removing a mask during a phone call where communication was difficult due to the mask. Consequently, the court replaced the food ration ban with a warning, allowing mask removal only after sanitizing the phone and obtaining staff permission.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 7 § 1 k.k.w.; Art. 7 § 5 k.k.w.: A disciplinary sanction must be proportionate to the offense; while vulgar language warrants punishment, removing a mask during a phone call does not justify a severe penalty like a food ration ban if communication difficulties are present.
Keywords
AI generated
prison disciplinary sanction
proportionality of punishment
food ration ban
mask removal during call
vulgar language offense
sanitary regulations
warning instead of ban
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 7 § 1 k.k.w.
Art. 7 § 5 k.k.w.
Related Decisions
AI generatedII Kow 81/19
Court upheld prison disciplinary fine for improper property handling and vulgar language.
II Kow 201/21
Court upheld prison disciplinary sanction for refusing meals to force favorable transfer decisions.
II K 539/13
Court convicted shop manager of falsifying food expiry dates and imposed a fine for breach of public order.
II Kow 22/21
Disciplinary fine for refusing questions upheld; prisoner confirmed misconduct and rejected disciplinary appeal.