III K 715/20
AI generated
Court convicts two defendants of property damage and orders fines and compensation for stolen camera trap.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found K. B. and S. N. guilty of property damage for stealing a camera trap and accessories, resulting in financial losses. The defendants argued for leniency, but the court emphasized the need for preventive punishment and the compensatory function of criminal law. Consequently, the court imposed daily fines, ordered joint compensation for the victim, and allocated court costs.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 kk; Art. 288 § 1 kk; Art. 37a kk; Art. 4 § 1 kk; Art. 46 § 1 kk: The court established that property damage constitutes a crime punishable by fines and requires compensatory restitution to the victim.
Keywords
AI generated
property damage
joint crime
daily fine
compensatory measure
court costs
preventive punishment
restitution
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 kk
Art. 288 § 1 kk
Art. 37a kk
Art. 4 § 1 kk
Art. 46 § 1 kk
Art. 29 ustawy Prawo o adwokaturze
Art. 627 kpk
Art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973 roku o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 18/22
Court convicts defendant of theft, sets daily fine at 30 PLN, and orders compensation for 2,120 PLN loss.
VII Ka 909/13
Court upheld conviction for attempted timber theft but suspended sentences for accomplices while convicting buyer of negligent purchase.
IV Ka 600/18
Court dismisses suspended sentence appeal due to failure to verify prior conviction erasure under Art. 107-108 CC.
II Ka 373/13
Criminal appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for property damage and rejected self-defense claim due to lack of direct unlawful attack.