II Ka 370/21
AI generated
Court modifies sentence for assault, increasing fine and awarding damages while upholding conviction.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe appellate court modified the first-instance judgment by increasing the daily fine to 200 units and ordering compensation for damages and pain and suffering. The defendant argued that the legal qualification of the assault was incorrect, while the prosecution contended the facts supported the conviction. The court rejected the appeal on the merits but found procedural errors regarding the calculation of defense costs, leading to a partial modification of the sentence.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 1, 2 k.p.k.; The court may modify a first-instance judgment when the appeal reveals a material error in legal qualification or a procedural defect affecting the judgment's content, even if the conviction stands.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal procedure
legal qualification error
procedural defect
assault conviction
fine modification
damages award
defense costs
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 163 § 1 pkt 1 i § 2 kk w zb. z art. 157 § 1 i 3 kk w zw. z art. 11 § 2 kk
art. 163 § 2 kk w zw. art. 11 § 3 kk w zw. z art. 37a kk
art. 46 § 1 kk
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 634 kpk
art. 635 kpk
art. 627 kpk
§ 11 ust. 2 pkt 4 w zw. z ust. 7 i § 17 pkt 1 Rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 22 października 2015 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie
art. 10 i art. 3 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedRelated Decisions
AI generatedIV Ka 948/19
UZASADNIENIE Formularz UK 2 Sygnatura akt IV Ka 948/19 Załącznik dołącza się w każdym przypadku.
IV Ka 705/22
Wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w Środzie Śląskiej z dnia 28 marca 2022 r., sygn.
II Ka 89/20
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for attempted rape and robbery under Polish Criminal Code.
VI Ka 203/23
Court quashes joint sentence for two defendants due to factual errors affecting the conviction outcome.
II Ka 185/25
Criminal appeal dismissed; conviction under Art. 178a § 4 kk upheld; costs awarded to state.