II Ca 956/13
AI generated
Court partially allowed appeal on joint property division, correcting a clerical error regarding payment start date.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal partially dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's joint property division order. While the division of the apartment and car was upheld, the court corrected a clerical error in the payment schedule, ruling that installments should begin in April 2014 rather than June 2013. The appellant's request to change the decision to their detriment was rejected as baseless since they did not file an appeal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 350 k.p.c.; Art. 520 § 3 k.p.c.: The court may correct clerical inaccuracies in a final judgment to ensure the text matches the intended decision, and an appeal is dismissed if the appellant fails to provide grounds for a change detrimental to the original party.
Keywords
AI generated
joint property division
clerical error correction
installment payment schedule
appeal dismissal
costs of proceedings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 520 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 13 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 350 k.p.c.
art. 42 k.r.o
art. 46 k.r.o
art. 1035 k.c
art. 201 k.c
art. 688 k.p.c
art. 31 k.r.o
Cited Case Law
AI generatedwyrok SN z dnia 15 maja 2001 roku, I CKN 350/00
postanowienie SN z dnia 4 października 2002 roku, III CZP 62/02
wyrok z dnia 11 marca 2004 roku, V CK 328/03
wyrok SN z dnia 14 lipca 2004 roku, IV CK 544/03
wyrok SN z dnia 24 czerwca 2005 roku, V CK 704/04
wyrok SN z dnia 25 sierpnia 2004 roku, I PK 22/03
uchwała SN z dnia 31 stycznia 2008 roku, III CZP 49/07
uzasadnienie postanowienia SN z dnia 8 października 2009 roku, II CK 2/09
uzasadnienie wyroku SN z dnia 24 kwietnia 1969 roku, III CRN 61/69
uzasadnienie postanowienia SN z dnia 14 stycznia 2000 roku, I CKN 357/87