Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I C 140/21 AI generated

Claim dismissed due to statute of limitations; insufficient evidence of debt acknowledgment by defendant.

Case Number I C 140/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the plaintiff's claim because the statute of limitations had expired. The plaintiff argued that the defendant acknowledged a specific debt, but the court found the submitted documents insufficient to prove this acknowledgment. Consequently, the claim was rejected as time-barred and unsupported by adequate evidence.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 115 k.c.; Art. 245 k.c.: A claim is barred by the statute of limitations if not pursued within the prescribed period, and insufficient documentation cannot establish a debt acknowledgment to revive or validate the claim.

Keywords

AI generated
statute of limitations civil claim dismissal debt acknowledgment insufficient evidence time bar

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 115 k.c.
Art. 245 k.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Powództwo nie zasługiwało na uwzględnienie z uwagi na upływ terminu przedawnienia. W ocenie Sądu treść przedłożonych w sprawie dokumentów jest niewystarczająca, aby przyjąć, że w sprawie doszło do uznania przez pozwanego długu w określonej wysokości i z określonego stosunku zobowiązaniowego.