Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III K 68/21 AI generated

Court convicted defendant of embezzlement, rejected retrial request citing lack of new evidence and procedural misconduct.

Case Number III K 68/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted the defendant of embezzlement and imposed a suspended prison sentence with a fine. The prosecution argued the defendant misappropriated a leased vehicle by refusing its return and acting as its owner. The defendant requested a retrial, claiming a witness changed her testimony and questioning his capacity to participate in proceedings. The court rejected the retrial request, finding the witness's potential change of statement irrelevant to the crime and confirming the defendant's capacity based on expert medical opinions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 459 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 459 § 2 k.p.k.: A request for retrial is inadmissible if the new evidence does not affect the outcome of the trial or if the defendant's absence was voluntary and their capacity to participate was confirmed by expert opinion.

Keywords

AI generated
embezzlement conviction retrial request rejection witness testimony relevance criminal capacity assessment suspended sentence application court costs allocation procedural misconduct

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 284 § 2 k.k.
Art. 294 § 1 k.k.
Art. 69 § 1 k.k.
Art. 69 § 2 k.k.
Art. 70 § 1 k.k.
Art. 72 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 626 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 627 k.p.k.
Art. 33 § 2 k.k.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II KZ 276/77
III KK 165/03
AI generated
II AKa 256/14
Appeal court quashes first-instance verdict on theft of leased vehicles due to insufficient evidence regarding decision-making authority.
II K 2168/12
Court convicted defendant of theft, suspended sentence for 3 years, ordered full restitution and waived court fees.
II AKa 248/24
Appeal against first-instance judgment on compensation for Polish Underground State activity dismissed due to procedural errors.
XII K 228/23
Court acquits defendant of embezzlement due to lack of intent to permanently deprive owner of property.
II AKa 546/15
Court upheld conviction for embezzlement of leased machinery valued over 400,000 PLN with suspended sentence.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text