Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
II K 161/21 AI generated

Court convicted defendant of possessing large quantity of cannabis under Art. 62 of Anti-Narcotics Act and sentenced to prison.

Case Number II K 161/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court found the defendant guilty of possessing a significant quantity of non-hemp cannabis in violation of the Anti-Narcotics Act. Evidence including search protocols, forensic analysis, and witness testimony confirmed the possession of over 1,000 grams intended for personal use. The court determined the facts met the statutory elements for a crime involving a large quantity and imposed a prison sentence due to the defendant's prior record and lack of remorse.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 62 ust. 2 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii; Art. 53 kk; The court established that possession of a large quantity of non-hemp cannabis constitutes a criminal offense under the Anti-Narcotics Act, warranting imprisonment when the quantity allows for selection of at least 2,178 portions.

Keywords

AI generated
possession of narcotics large quantity of cannabis Anti-Narcotics Act criminal conviction prison sentence forensic analysis significant social harm

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 62 ust. 2 ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii
Art. 53 kk
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
AI generated
VII K 262/20
Court convicts defendant for drug possession and driving under influence, imposing a fine based on prior record.
II K 221/23
Court acquits defendant of drug possession due to justified mistake regarding product legality.
III K 19/21
Court imposes prison terms for drug trafficking but grants probation to the minor defendant.
III K 68/15
Court convicted defendant of cannabis cultivation and imposed prison sentence with fine.
I KK 274/22
Supreme Court dismissed cassation against drug trafficking conviction due to sufficient evidence and lack of procedural errors.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text