II K 107/19
AI generated
Court finds excessive defense but grants no penalty due to defendant's age and mental state.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court found the defendant guilty of attempted intentional injury but applied a statutory exemption from sentencing. The defendant argued for exemption under Article 25, Section 3 of the Criminal Code, claiming the defense was not excessive. The court rejected this specific provision but granted a full exemption from penalty under Article 25, Section 2, citing the defendant's youth, mental health issues, and the specific circumstances of the case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 13 § 1 k.k.; Art. 148 § 1 k.k.; Art. 157 § 1 k.k.; Art. 25 § 2 k.k.; Art. 61 § 1 k.k.: Although the defense exceeded necessary limits, the court may exempt the defendant from penalty if the circumstances and personal factors justify it.
Keywords
AI generated
excessive defense
exemption from penalty
attempted injury
mental health
youth mitigation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 13 § 1 k.k.
Art. 148 § 1 k.k.
Art. 157 § 1 k.k.
Art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.k.
Art. 25 § 2 k.k.
Art. 61 § 1 k.k.
Art. 25 § 3 k.k.
art. 13§1 k.k
art. 148§1 k.k
art. 157§1 k.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedXI Ka 940/18
Court quashes criminal verdict for procedural error and remands case for retrial.
II K 499/16
Court dismisses charges against defendants who exceeded necessary defense limits due to justified fear of a knife attack.
IV K 686/17
Court convicted recidivist of assault and threats, imposing 8 months prison with detention credit.
II K 120/23
Court convicted defendant of intentional injury with suspended sentence and awarded partial compensation to victim.