Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II Ka 475/21 AI generated

Court increases fine for animal cruelty and orders forfeiture of horses due to factual error.

Case Number II Ka 475/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Court of Appeal partially modified the first-instance judgment regarding a defendant charged with animal cruelty and theft. The court found a factual error concerning the recipient of the fine and the specific animals involved, leading to an increased monetary penalty and a new order for the forfeiture of two horses. Consequently, the appeal was allowed in part to correct these specific errors while the remainder of the original verdict remained in force.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 35 ust. 1 a Ustawy o ochronie zwierząt; art. 244 k.k.; Art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.: The court may modify a first-instance judgment when a factual error regarding the amount of a fine or the subject matter of forfeiture affects the outcome, even if the legal qualification remains correct.

Keywords

AI generated
animal cruelty factual error fine modification forfeiture of property second instance appeal proportionality of penalty court of appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 35 ust. 1 a Ustawy z dnia 21 sierpnia 1997 r. o ochronie zwierząt
art. 244 k.k.
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 634 kpk
art. 624 § 1 kpk
art. 17 ust. 1 i 2 ustawy z dnia 23 czerwca 1973 r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text