Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI ACa 783/19 AI generated

Court dismisses appeal regarding sentence length for attempted theft under Polish Criminal Code provisions.

Case Number VI ACa 783/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the defendant's appeal against the first-instance sentence for attempted theft. The prosecution argued the act constituted a serious offense under Article 928 of the Criminal Code, while the defense contested the severity of the penalty. The court upheld the original judgment, noting that a sentence of up to three years is typically considered a lighter sanction within the Criminal Code framework.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 160 § 1 k.k.; Art. 928 § 1 pkt. 1 k.c.: An attempted theft punishable by imprisonment up to three years is generally classified as a less serious offense, warranting a proportionate sentence that does not require escalation to heavier penalties absent aggravating circumstances.

Keywords

AI generated
attempted theft Criminal Code sentencing guidelines serious offense appellate review proportionality principle penal sanction

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 160 § 1 k.k.
występek zagrożony karą pozbawienia wolności do lat trzech - jak czyn opisany w art. 160 par.
Art. 928 § 1 pkt. 1 k.c.
będzie uznany za ciężkie przestępstwo w rozumieniu art. 928 par.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

występek zagrożony karą pozbawienia wolności do lat trzech - jak czyn opisany w art. 160 par. 1 k.k. będzie uznany za ciężkie przestępstwo w rozumieniu art. 928 par. 1 pkt. 1 k.c., raczej rzadko, bo jest to jedna z łagodniejszych sankcji w kodeksie karnym