Filing a lawsuit interrupted the limitation period even if the proceedings were later dismissed under the Civil Procedure Code.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court dismissed the defendant's request to reinstate the limitation period as if the lawsuit had never been filed. The plaintiff had initiated proceedings which were subsequently terminated under Article 505(37) paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court ruled that this procedural termination did not erase the legal consequence of the lawsuit's initiation, specifically the interruption of the limitation period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 505 ust. 37 pkt 1 k.p.c.; The termination of proceedings under this provision does not negate the legal effects of filing a claim, including the interruption of the limitation period.
Keywords
AI generatedCited Legislation
AI generatedFull text
Umorzenie postępowania na podstawie art. 505 (37) par. 1 k.p.c. nie prowadziło do zniwelowania skutków, jakie związane są z wytoczeniem powództwa, w tym w szczególności nie niwelowało skutku w postaci przerwania biegu przedawnienia