Legislator Case Law & Legislation
VI ACa 729/20 AI generated

Filing a lawsuit interrupted the limitation period even if the proceedings were later dismissed under the Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number VI ACa 729/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court dismissed the defendant's request to reinstate the limitation period as if the lawsuit had never been filed. The plaintiff had initiated proceedings which were subsequently terminated under Article 505(37) paragraph 1 of the Civil Procedure Code. The court ruled that this procedural termination did not erase the legal consequence of the lawsuit's initiation, specifically the interruption of the limitation period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 505 ust. 37 pkt 1 k.p.c.; The termination of proceedings under this provision does not negate the legal effects of filing a claim, including the interruption of the limitation period.

Keywords

AI generated
limitation period interruption civil procedure code proceedings termination legal consequences time bar reinstatement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 505 ust. 37 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Umorzenie postępowania na podstawie art. 505 (37) par.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Umorzenie postępowania na podstawie art. 505 (37) par. 1 k.p.c. nie prowadziło do zniwelowania skutków, jakie związane są z wytoczeniem powództwa, w tym w szczególności nie niwelowało skutku w postaci przerwania biegu przedawnienia