Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
VI K 328/21 AI generated

Court sentenced three accomplices to prison for robbery and assault while granting them full exemption from state court costs.

Case Number VI K 328/21
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The court convicted three defendants of robbery and assault, ordering them to serve prison sentences starting from their arrest date. The prosecution argued for standard penalties, but the court emphasized the defendants' prior convictions and the violent nature of the crime. Despite the severity of the charges, the court fully exempted the defendants from paying state court costs due to their lack of assets and income while incarcerated.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 280 §1 k.k.; Art. 64 §1, §2 k.k.; Art. 63 §1 k.k.; Art. 624 §1 k.p.k.; Art. 626 §1 k.p.k. - When defendants are convicted of serious crimes but lack the financial means to pay court costs due to incarceration and poverty, the court must grant a full exemption from state costs under Art. 624 §1 k.p.k. and award those costs to the appointed defense attorneys.

Keywords

AI generated
robbery conviction joint criminal enterprise court costs exemption indigent defendants state compensation prison sentence legal aid funding

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 280 §1 k.k.
Art. 64 §1 k.k.
Art. 64 §2 k.k.
Art. 63 §1 k.k.
Art. 624 §1 k.p.k.
Art. 626 §1 k.p.k.
Ustawa z dnia 26 maja 1982 r. Prawo o adwokaturze
Rozporządzenie Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 3 października 2016 r.
art. 280 §1 k.k
art. 64 §2 k.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
IV KK 489/07
AI generated
VI K 796/20
Court convicted recidivist of theft with minor weight, sentencing to one year of restricted liberty.
II K 263/20
Court imposes 10-year driving ban and 1.5 years prison for repeated drunk driving violations.
II AKa 136/12
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for attempted robbery and threats due to lack of evidence and established facts.
VI K 670/22
Court sentenced two recidivists to ten months imprisonment for theft of property worth nearly ten thousand zlotys.
II AKa 83/13
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for robbery by a recidivist, rejecting defense arguments on evidence and handedness.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text