VI Ka 176/21
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; defense failed to prove procedural errors or factual mistakes affecting the conviction.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Court of Appeal dismissed the defense's appeal against the first-instance conviction for theft and fraud. The defense argued for a change in the verdict citing procedural violations and factual errors, but the court found no such defects. Consequently, the original judgment upholding the defendant's guilt was maintained in full force.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 438 pkt 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.; The appeal is rejected when the defense fails to substantiate procedural errors or factual mistakes that could have influenced the trial outcome.
Keywords
AI generated
criminal appeal
procedural error
factual mistake
theft conviction
costs of proceedings
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k.
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k.
art. 636 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 8 i art. 2 ust. 1 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 23.06.1973r. o opłatach w sprawach karnych
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 2 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 3 k.p.k
art. 438 pkt 4 k.p.k
art. 439 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedIV Ka 195/24
Court modifies criminal ban on driving to exclude vehicles requiring category B license for defendant's employment.
IX Ka 754/23
Court partially allowed appeal, reducing 10-year driving ban to 3 years due to lack of danger to traffic safety.
IX Ka 790/23
Appeal dismissed for prosecutor; defendant appeal partially allowed regarding sentence modification.
IX Ka 646/23
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for insult by police officer without duty, rejecting omission of official duty element.
VI Ka 916/21
Appeal dismissed; court upheld conviction for press offense citing no procedural error affecting verdict.