Court dismissed appeal against electronic parole denial due to lack of technical conditions at the requested address.

The Court of Appeal upheld the District Court's decision to reject the prisoner's request for electronic parole without further examination. The prisoner argued that a local team forced him to install a shelf for the transmitter before signal verification, while his neighbor with similar conditions faced no issues. The court ruled that the prison authority's finding of insufficient technical conditions at the specified address was legally binding and the prisoner's claims were merely disputes over that conclusion.