III K 748/20
AI generated
Court imposed prison sentence and compensation order for recidivist theft and fraud despite victim restitution.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted the defendant of theft and fraud, imposing a six-month prison sentence and a compensation order totaling 130 zloty. Although the victim had already recovered the stolen phone, the court ruled that the compensation order remains necessary to address the defendant's recidivism and lack of remorse. The judgment emphasizes the preventive goals of criminal law over the specific restitution status of the stolen item.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.; Art. 286 § 1, 3 k.k.; Art. 64 § 1 k.k.; Art. 46 § 1 k.k.; Art. 29 Prawo o adwokaturze: A recidivist offender must receive a prison sentence and a compensation order even if the victim has recovered the stolen property, as the order serves the preventive and educational functions of criminal law.
Keywords
AI generated
recidivism sentencing
theft and fraud
compensation order
preventive justice
victim restitution
prison sentence
legal education
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 278 § 1 k.k.
Art. 286 § 1 k.k.
Art. 286 § 3 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
Art. 46 § 1 k.k.
Art. 29 Prawo o adwokaturze
Art. 624 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 278 § 1 k.k
art. 64 § 1 k.k
art. 387 k.p.k
Cited Case Law
AI generatedV KK 324/02
Related Decisions
AI generatedIX Ka 333/14
Court dismissed appeal against theft conviction, upholding first instance verdict on facts and sentencing.
II K 1088/22
Court convicts two defendants of robbery and theft, ordering joint civil compensation for victim's losses.
II K 134/17
Court convicts defendant of theft with recidivism, imposing combined prison term and civil compensation.
IV Ka 1388/13
Court partially allowed appeal by acquitting one defendant and reducing combined sentence while returning evidence to victim.