II K 495/20
AI generated
Court imposes 4-year proximity ban on arsonists and threats to victims for public safety and prevention.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe court convicted two defendants of arson and repeated threats, subsequently imposing a four-year proximity ban on the victims. The prosecution argued that the defendants were aggressive, unpredictable, and required strict measures to prevent further harm. The court agreed, noting the high social danger and the need to protect the victims' legal interests.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 63 § 1 k.k.; Art. 64 § 1 k.k.; Art. 163 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.; Art. 190 § 1 k.k.: The court may impose a proximity ban as a criminal sanction when the offender poses a high social danger and the primary function of the penalty is prevention and protection of the legal order.
Keywords
AI generated
proximity ban
criminal sanction
arson conviction
threats to life
prevention of crime
social danger
victim protection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 63 § 1 k.k.
Art. 64 § 1 k.k.
Art. 163 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 190 § 1 k.k.
art. 387 k.p.k
Related Decisions
AI generatedII K 1294/11
Court convicted defendant of arson, threats, and assault, imposing four years imprisonment for repeated crimes against family.
II K 662/14
Court imposed suspended sentence for arson charges due to confession and remorse.
II K 1307/19
Court convicts arsonists and orders state to pay defense costs for indigent defendants.
II K 609/20
Court dismissed defendant's request for partial reasoning regarding civil liability due to lack of specific grounds.
IV Ka 304/15
Court upheld arson conviction based on witness credibility and circumstantial evidence despite defense alibi claims.