Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II AKa 400/19 AI generated

Appeal court dismisses drug trafficking charges against H.R. due to procedural errors and factual mistakes in the first instance verdict.

Case Number II AKa 400/19
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court partially overturned the first-instance judgment, completely acquitting H.R. of all charges while remanding the cases against G.G., R.K., and W.S. for retrial. The defense successfully argued that the lower court committed procedural violations and factual errors regarding the evidence presented. Consequently, the court declared the proceedings against H.R. terminated and ordered the state to cover defense costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 438 pkt. 2, 3 k.p.k.; Art. 439 § 1 pkt. 9 k.p.k.; The appeal court must quash a first-instance verdict if it contains procedural violations or factual errors that could have influenced the judgment, leading to either termination of proceedings or remittal for retrial depending on the scope of the error.

Keywords

AI generated
drug trafficking charges procedural violations factual errors acquittal of defendant remittal for retrial defense costs appeal court decision

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 438 pkt. 2 k.p.k.
Art. 438 pkt. 3 k.p.k.
Art. 439 § 1 pkt. 9 k.p.k.
art. 18 § 3 k.k
art. 11 § 2 k.k
art. 65 § 1 k.k
art. 282 k.k
art. 204 § 2 k.k
art. 263 § 2 k.k
art. 438 pkt 1 k.p.k

Cited Case Law

AI generated
AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text