Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
XXVII Ca 1888/20 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; court upheld lower court's judgment ordering payment of damages to the plaintiff.

Case Number XXVII Ca 1888/20
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The appellate court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against the regional court's judgment ordering payment of damages. The plaintiff argued that the lower court failed to adequately assess the extent of their losses, while the defendant contended the awarded amount was excessive. The court rejected these arguments, affirming that the lower court correctly applied the law and factual findings to determine the appropriate compensation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 375 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 376 § 1 k.p.c.: The appellate court must examine the appeal on the merits and may confirm, modify, or revoke the lower court's judgment if the facts and law support a different outcome.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal procedure damages assessment appellate review standard judgment confirmation plaintiff compensation claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 375 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 376 § 1 k.p.c.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text

Sygn. akt XXVII Ca 1888/20 WYROK W IMIENIU RZECZYPOSPOLITEJ POLSKIEJ Dnia 7 kwietnia 2021 r. Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie XXVII Wydział Cywilny-Odwoławczy w składzie: Przewodniczący: Sędzia Joanna Staszewska po rozpoznaniu w dniu 7 kwietnia 2021 r. w Warszawie na posiedzeniu niejawnym sprawy z powództwa (...) SA w W. przeciwko (...) sp. z o.o. w W. o zapłatę na skutek apelacji powoda od wyroku Sądu Rejonowego dla m.st. Warszawy w Warszawie z dnia 4 sierpnia 2020 r., sygn. akt I C 2665/19 oddala apelację. Joanna Staszewska (...)